<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>(6x6) Blog &#187; Polaroid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.taitsimpson.com/category/polaroid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.taitsimpson.com</link>
	<description>6x6 is the blog of editorial and commercial photographer Tait Simpson. Brooklyn, New York creating artistic environmental portraits and landscape images.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:05:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Resurrection of Polaroid?</title>
		<link>http://blog.taitsimpson.com/2009/05/the-resurrection-of-polaroid/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.taitsimpson.com/2009/05/the-resurrection-of-polaroid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tait</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polaroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taitsimpson.com/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a curious post on the New York Times photo blog Lens (which if you haven&#8217;t checked it out yet, is really quite slick) about the possible revival of Polaroid film, with a link to a full article also from the NYT, about former Polaroid workers trying to bring back instant film.  The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a curious post on the New York Times photo blog <a href="http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/" target="_blank">Lens</a> (which if you haven&#8217;t checked it out yet, is really quite slick) about the possible revival of Polaroid film, with a link to a full article also from the NYT, about former Polaroid workers trying to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/26/technology/26polaroid.html" target ="_blank">bring back instant film</a>.  The possibility is very exciting, especially for those of us in the photographic community that appreciate historical, non digital processes.  It appears they are focusing on film for the SX-70, but I&#8217;ll just keep my fingers crossed that someday in the not too distant future there may be a revival of the sheet films.  Here are couple of my favorite polaroids from the archive:</p>
<p><img class="left" src="http://blog.taitsimpson.com/images/transfer_3412.jpg" alt="Untitled" /><br /><credit>Untitled (polaroid transfer) 2004</credit></p>
<p><img class="left" src="http://blog.taitsimpson.com/images/polaroidfan.jpg" alt="Fan" /><br /><credit>Fan 2003</credit></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.taitsimpson.com/2009/05/the-resurrection-of-polaroid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
